Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quick fix to make valuecurves visible in model library #1163

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kdayday
Copy link
Contributor

@kdayday kdayday commented Jul 27, 2024

Value curves page in the model library was showing missing docs due to duplication with the API. Quick fix to at least make them all visible (if a bit out of order), pending final docs organization

@kdayday kdayday requested review from GabrielKS and jd-lara July 27, 2024 01:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.75%. Comparing base (3a6b909) to head (2b37b69).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1163   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.75%   84.75%           
=======================================
  Files         182      182           
  Lines        8349     8349           
=======================================
  Hits         7076     7076           
  Misses       1273     1273           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.75% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@jd-lara
Copy link
Member

jd-lara commented Jul 29, 2024

@GabrielKS we are planning to move value curves to IS anyway. We should make this change part of that transition.

@kdayday kdayday closed this Jul 29, 2024
@kdayday kdayday deleted the value_curve_docs branch September 10, 2024 02:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants