You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This could be through vds_multi_autocomplete_value or a new endpoint. If it's through vds_multi_autocomplete_value then it could either be used as a sort when the prefix is empty, or it could be another option to this action (i.e. sort order: alphabetical or frequency).
Whether this is a new action or reuses an existing action probably depends on how vds_multi_autocomplete_value is implemented and whether a sort can be added to it.
This is dependant on the preps changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there actually much point in having autocomplete results sorted alphabetically anyway, especially by default? If you're using an autocomplete you presumably want the most relevant results first, which is more likely to be the frequently used values.
This could be through
vds_multi_autocomplete_value
or a new endpoint. If it's throughvds_multi_autocomplete_value
then it could either be used as a sort when the prefix is empty, or it could be another option to this action (i.e. sort order: alphabetical or frequency).Whether this is a new action or reuses an existing action probably depends on how
vds_multi_autocomplete_value
is implemented and whether a sort can be added to it.This is dependant on the preps changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: