Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Add Check]: Check for unofficial versions of schema #432

Open
CodyCBakerPhD opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Add Check]: Check for unofficial versions of schema #432

CodyCBakerPhD opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
category: new check a new best practices check to apply to all NWBFiles and their contents priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users

Comments

@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Contributor

AFAIK ATM we do not impose any limits on versions of nwb schema in the files really... I agree indeed it could be at least some kind of a WARNING level annotation by nwb inspector... and I would not mind ERROR level for "dandi" profile to avoid cases of unloadable files the future.

Originally posted by @yarikoptic in NeurodataWithoutBorders/pynwb#1837 (comment)
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD mentioned this issue Feb 1, 2024
Open
3 tasks
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD changed the title Check for unofficial versions of schema [Add Check]: Check for unofficial versions of schema Sep 17, 2024
@stephprince stephprince added category: new check a new best practices check to apply to all NWBFiles and their contents priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users labels Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
category: new check a new best practices check to apply to all NWBFiles and their contents priority: medium non-critical problem and/or affecting only a small set of NWB users
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@stephprince @CodyCBakerPhD