Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should 1.10 be required already on L1? #631

Closed
mascotter opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed

Should 1.10 be required already on L1? #631

mascotter opened this issue Mar 7, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@mascotter
Copy link

The requirement "1.10 MSTG-ARCH-10 Security is addressed within all parts of the software development lifecycle." is currently a L2 requirement. Addressing security in the whole SDL process should IMO be the very basics of any requirement set or framework.

In addition, the requirement 1.12 stipulates compliancy with privacy laws and regulations already on L1. I cannot imagine how e.g. compliancy against GDPR's privacy and security by design and default can be demonstrated if security is not addressed within all parts of the SDL.

@OWASP OWASP locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 9, 2022
@cpholguera cpholguera converted this issue into discussion #634 Mar 9, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant