Welcome to AI discussions at OWASP! #16
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Can anyone help me with the assessment for AI? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your email. Certainly! I’m interested in assessing all of these
parameters.
Thanks & best Regards,
…On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 2:39 PM, Rob van der Veer ***@***.***> wrote:
What would you like to assess?
-Accuracy
-Security
-Sensitivity to adversarial attack (part of security actually)?
-Unwanted bias
-Purpose-binding data usage / consent
-Legal/ethical purpose
-Maintainability
-Maturity of the development process
-Transparency
-Explainability
-Performance
-Scalability
-Reliability
-Privacy rights
?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#16 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWJMZILVCFO6WMSYK4BHSJDYHQ6TJAVCNFSM6AAAAAA5SHADJGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TONBSG4YDA>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
<OWASP/www-project-ai-security-and-privacy-guide/repo-discussions/16/comments/7742700
@github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a recommendation: Any time an acronym is used for the first time in a page, that acronym should be spelled out in parentheses. Use of common acronyms may seem obvious to the person writing the article or page, but are not always known or immediately obvious to readers coming to learn. The typical convention for this is, for example: Whole Phrase Spelled Out (WPSO). You don't always have to do this. You have a list of privacy frameworks, for example... but they are grouped and referred to as privacy frameworks. So, while they are not spelled out, they are defined. MFA Flow: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
👋 Welcome!
We’re using Discussions as a place to connect with other members of our community. We hope that you:
build together 💪.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions