Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make section on Threat Modeling more brief #344

Open
jgadsden opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #358
Open

Make section on Threat Modeling more brief #344

jgadsden opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #358
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jgadsden
Copy link
Collaborator

jgadsden commented Jan 30, 2025

Describe what change you would like :
The section on Threat Modeling maybe goes on a bit too long, there are several other sources that describe threat modeling better than this section. The DevGuide seeks to be a 'Lonely Planet' guide rather than a providing in-depth on any one subject, and this section is more than just a brief introduction to the subject

It would be good to revise the section on threat modeling so it is shorter and to the point
the intention there is to cut the length down by 50% or so, because really it is repeating the Threat Modeling Cheat Sheet

Context :
Section: 06-design/01-threat-modeling/01-threat-modeling

@jgadsden jgadsden added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2025
@jgadsden
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pUrGe12 I can assign this to you if you like
we want to cut this down to less than half if possible, and reference the various links more

@pUrGe12
Copy link
Collaborator

pUrGe12 commented Feb 14, 2025

Yes sure! I'll do some research and make the updates

@pUrGe12 pUrGe12 self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
@pUrGe12 pUrGe12 linked a pull request Feb 14, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants