You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 8, 2024. It is now read-only.
It is possible to achieve High Availability in Redis by master-slave replication, but most likely the costs of operating replicas is not worth for the short unexpected downtimes. I thinks it is better to temporarily disable rate limits by skipping the queries when Redis is not reachable. This way, we can offer HA in frontend, even when we don't in Redis with minimal changes in operation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In case seperating the instances is not necessary, they can also use a single redis with HA, but I think it is better to have the option not to depend on Redis HA from the front end, it would not cause any problems when redis is also replicated, which would be useful/necessary for wss.
It is possible to achieve High Availability in Redis by master-slave replication, but most likely the costs of operating replicas is not worth for the short unexpected downtimes. I thinks it is better to temporarily disable rate limits by skipping the queries when Redis is not reachable. This way, we can offer HA in frontend, even when we don't in Redis with minimal changes in operation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: