Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No values in storages.NutzbareSpeicherkapazitaet #416

Closed
nesnoj opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

No values in storages.NutzbareSpeicherkapazitaet #416

nesnoj opened this issue Jan 25, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working

Comments

@nesnoj
Copy link
Collaborator

nesnoj commented Jan 25, 2023

The attribute NutzbareSpeicherkapazitaet in the storage table is always nan.
However, it is filled on the website (example) and given in the AnlagenStromSpeicher_*.xml files.

Do you observe the same in your exported datasets?

@nesnoj nesnoj added the 🐛 bug Something isn't working label Jan 25, 2023
@FlorianK13
Copy link
Member

The download speed today is so bad, I havent manage to get the current xml files to test it.

@FlorianK13
Copy link
Member

FlorianK13 commented Jan 30, 2023

Strangely, for storages there are three tables (all other technologies have two tables):
AnlagenEEGSpeicher - storage_eeg
AnlagenStromSpeicher - storage_units
EinheitenStromSpeicher - storage_extended

@nesnoj In storage_units you can find the values for NutzbareSpeicherkapazitaet.

@nesnoj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nesnoj commented Feb 13, 2023

Strangely, for storages there are three tables (all other technologies have two tables): AnlagenEEGSpeicher - storage_eeg AnlagenStromSpeicher - storage_units EinheitenStromSpeicher - storage_extended

@nesnoj In storage_units you can find the values for NutzbareSpeicherkapazitaet.

I see, thank you. While the join of storage_extended and storage_units could be made part of the database creation, it's probably too specific raising the question why we don't do this for other data, e.g. grid information. I've put it on the postprocessing list #411.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants