You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In content/first-order-logic/completeness/henkin-expansions.tex, there is a proposition:
If $\Gamma$ is consistent in $\Lang L$ and $\Lang L'$ is obtained from $\Lang L$ by adding !!a{denumerable} set of new !!{constant}s $\Obj d_0$, $\Obj d_1$, \dots, then $\Gamma$ is consistent in~$\Lang L'$.
which doesn't have a proof. I think it should, although perhaps it could be an exercise (doesn't seem like it should be a very involved proof though).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah yes, true. The proof depends on the proof system used, so there should be corresponding propositions (with proof left as exercise) in each of the proof system chapters.
In content/first-order-logic/completeness/henkin-expansions.tex, there is a proposition:
If $\Gamma$ is consistent in $\Lang L$ and $\Lang L'$ is obtained from $\Lang L$ by adding !!a{denumerable} set of new !!{constant}s $\Obj d_0$, $\Obj d_1$, \dots, then $\Gamma$ is consistent in~$\Lang L'$.
which doesn't have a proof. I think it should, although perhaps it could be an exercise (doesn't seem like it should be a very involved proof though).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: