-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gigabit Ethernet poorly iperf performance #5
Comments
Thank you for answer. |
jserv
pushed a commit
to jserv/linux-ma35d1
that referenced
this issue
Dec 27, 2024
[ Upstream commit 14694179e561b5f2f7e56a0f590e2cb49a9cc7ab ] Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- sh/92 is trying to acquire lock: c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 but task is already holding lock: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 6 locks held by sh/92: #0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 OpenNuvoton#1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284 OpenNuvoton#2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284 OpenNuvoton#3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8 OpenNuvoton#4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c OpenNuvoton#5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48 dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c __lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0 lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100 __irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4 atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204 irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8 gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248 dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c __device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8 dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84 suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8 pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4 state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284 kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4 vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178 ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0) 3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001 3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190 3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26 This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent" IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue. Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and children IRQ Fixes: 7761808 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller") Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
jserv
pushed a commit
to jserv/linux-ma35d1
that referenced
this issue
Dec 27, 2024
[ Upstream commit 33eae65c6f49770fec7a662935d4eb4a6406d24b ] A small CIFS buffer (448 bytes) isn't big enough to hold SMB2_QUERY_INFO request along with user's input data from CIFS_QUERY_INFO ioctl. That is, if the user passed an input buffer > 344 bytes, the client will memcpy() off the end of @req->Buffer in SMB2_query_info_init() thus causing the following KASAN splat: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in SMB2_query_info_init+0x242/0x250 [cifs] Write of size 1023 at addr ffff88801308c5a8 by task a.out/1240 CPU: 1 PID: 1240 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.7.0-rc4 OpenNuvoton#5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 print_report+0xcf/0x650 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __phys_addr+0x46/0x90 kasan_report+0xd8/0x110 ? SMB2_query_info_init+0x242/0x250 [cifs] ? SMB2_query_info_init+0x242/0x250 [cifs] kasan_check_range+0x105/0x1b0 __asan_memcpy+0x3c/0x60 SMB2_query_info_init+0x242/0x250 [cifs] ? __pfx_SMB2_query_info_init+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? smb_rqst_len+0xa6/0xc0 [cifs] smb2_ioctl_query_info+0x4f4/0x9a0 [cifs] ? __pfx_smb2_ioctl_query_info+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? __pfx_cifsConvertToUTF16+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? cifs_strndup_to_utf16+0x12d/0x1a0 [cifs] ? __build_path_from_dentry_optional_prefix+0x19d/0x2d0 [cifs] ? __pfx_smb2_ioctl_query_info+0x10/0x10 [cifs] cifs_ioctl+0x11c7/0x1de0 [cifs] ? __pfx_cifs_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [cifs] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x6cd/0x850 ? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10 ? blkcg_iostat_update+0x250/0x290 ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 ? ksys_write+0xe9/0x170 __x64_sys_ioctl+0xc9/0x100 do_syscall_64+0x47/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7f893dde49cf Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <89> c2 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 18 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007ffc03ff4160 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc03ff4378 RCX: 00007f893dde49cf RDX: 00007ffc03ff41d0 RSI: 00000000c018cf07 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007ffc03ff4260 R08: 0000000000000410 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 00007f893dce7300 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffc03ff4388 R14: 00007f893df15000 R15: 0000000000406de0 </TASK> Fix this by increasing size of SMB2_QUERY_INFO request buffers and validating input length to prevent other callers from overflowing @Req in SMB2_query_info_init() as well. Fixes: f5b05d6 ("cifs: add IOCTL for QUERY_INFO passthrough to userspace") Cc: [email protected] Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I got poorly iperf results testing NuMaker-IoT-MA35D1-A1 board Gigabit Ethernet (ETH0).
I could not achieve 1Gbps in standard iperf tests (got around ~750 Mbits/sec) but during iperf bidirectional test results have been really poor not achieving 1Gbps in (TX: ~500 Mbits/sec and RX: ~200 Mbits/sec).
In addiction during iperf test the CPU is highly loaded (CPU0 100%, CPU1 60%). Using top I have seen that one of the elements that is high loading the CPU is ksoftirqd:
Here are the iperf output too:
I'm using last 5.10 kernel from this repository.
Do you know how to fix this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: