Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thumbnail and Screenshot Links #1273

Open
mmarum-sugarcrm opened this issue Jun 5, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Thumbnail and Screenshot Links #1273

mmarum-sugarcrm opened this issue Jun 5, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@mmarum-sugarcrm
Copy link
Member

Original author: [email protected] (April 05, 2012 21:01:37)

SPECIFICATION BUGS ONLY - Description
=====================================
We already dumped the Icon element in favor of Link/@rel="icon" ... we should do the same for @screenshot and @thumbnail links...

e.g. <Link rel="screenshot" href="..." /> and <Link rel="thumbnail" href="..." />

Document affected:
==================
1.) Please attach a patch for the document if appropriate.
2.) Post a thread at
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/topics
linking to this issue report.
3.) Post a comment on this issue, linking back to the thread.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/opensocial-resources/issues/detail?id=1288

@mmarum-sugarcrm
Copy link
Member Author

From [email protected] on May 14, 2012 22:35:35
Better yet, let's consolidate "screenshot" and "thumbnail" into a single "preview" link relation as defined... in http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-additional-link-relations-04.txt

@mmarum-sugarcrm
Copy link
Member Author

From [email protected] on May 14, 2012 23:25:32
James, the spec has a suggested size for the thumbnail image, I believe it is 120x60. I think the assumption, and this is probably a bad assumption, is that screenshot is larger than that. If we consolidate both into a a link of rel preview, are we loosing some functionality?

@mmarum-sugarcrm
Copy link
Member Author

From [email protected] on May 16, 2012 16:26:25
Yes, potentially... as a tradeoff for overall simplification of the spec.

@mmarum-sugarcrm
Copy link
Member Author

From [email protected] on May 16, 2012 16:26:31
Yes, potentially... as a tradeoff for overall simplification of the spec.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant