How would you like Schema to struct generation to look like?

[Oudwins]

One of the next features I would like to work on is a CLI to generate structs based on your ZogSchemas. This is a good first step for other generators based on the ZogSchemas such as but not limited to:

• typescript types
• Zod schemas
• openapi specs
• ...

With that in mind I would like to pool you all on a few things:

• Any other output you would like? (a part from the ones mentioned above)
• Once you run the CLI should the generation be opt in or opt out? i.e should running the CLI automatically generate all corresponding structs unless your ZogSchema has some magic comment above it or only generate those that have that magic comment?
• Ideas on the generated names for the structs. I think the best solution is to use standard naming convention for default generated names but allow the user to specify a struct name with a magic comment. For example, if no magic comment is set userSchema would generate a type User struct

[luckycatx]

Any other output you would like? (a part from the ones mentioned above)

No idea yet

Once you run the CLI should the generation be opt in or opt out? i.e should running the CLI automatically generate all corresponding structs unless your ZogSchema has some magic comment above it or only generate those that have that magic comment?

Generate those that have the magic comment would be better. It would be easier and cleaner for embedding with existing codegen (e.g. rpc, db code generation)

Ideas on the generated names for the structs. I think the best solution is to use standard naming convention for default generated names but allow the user to specify a struct name with a magic comment. For example, if no magic comment is set userSchema would generate a type User struct

I have no opinion on schema -> struct, but for struct -> schema I would prefer the generated string reference typed field names the same as the original field names (instead of lowercase the first letter)