You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found a very nice Rust crate (i.e. library) which allows us to interface from Rust with the Android Binder APIs (and this is key!) without having to build any of uProtocol out of the AOSP.
This is work done to support the pluggable uStreamer concept so that we can have a single uStreamer written in Rust that will allow usage with the available transports.
I have extended its functionality in a fork and wanted to hear feedback from the uProtocol community what we should do with the modifications.
I think the spirit of open source would say I go open an issue on their repo letting them know I made modifications for our use case and asking if they'd like to incorporate them. We'd then let them continue to maintain as necessary.
I'm thinking to start with that step and then if I don't hear back, we can consider to go from there, e.g.
Moving this project underneath eclipse-uprotocol project or
Leaving it here under my personal account and I publish to crates.io so that we can depend on a stabler release
Further details follow about the extensions, read on if you so choose! 🙂
I have extended it with two new functionalities for our use case:
In support of calling into a Rust native function from the Java Android application which manages Android Binder service (UCoreService) to hand-off the Java Binder object for the UBus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey folks 👋
I found a very nice Rust crate (i.e. library) which allows us to interface from Rust with the Android Binder APIs (and this is key!) without having to build any of uProtocol out of the AOSP.
This is work done to support the pluggable uStreamer concept so that we can have a single uStreamer written in Rust that will allow usage with the available transports.
I have extended its functionality in a fork and wanted to hear feedback from the uProtocol community what we should do with the modifications.
I think the spirit of open source would say I go open an issue on their repo letting them know I made modifications for our use case and asking if they'd like to incorporate them. We'd then let them continue to maintain as necessary.
I'm thinking to start with that step and then if I don't hear back, we can consider to go from there, e.g.
eclipse-uprotocol
project orFurther details follow about the extensions, read on if you so choose! 🙂
I have extended it with two new functionalities for our use case:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: