Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chapter 3 Xacro files and urdf files results are different while xacro being wrong #9

Open
rohitdavas opened this issue Apr 7, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@rohitdavas
Copy link

rohitdavas commented Apr 7, 2021

W.r.t to chapter 3 I would like to raise some issues.
**ROS ** - Noetic

Issue one :
roslaunch robot_description arm_gazebo_control.launch and roslaunch robot_description arm_gazebo_control_xacro.launch produces different results.

The results can be seen below.

arm_urdf_correct

arm_xacro_wrong


  1. Manipulator urdf file launch gives correct results while xacro file throws error. Plus in source code of manipulator xacro launch you are launching the urdf file only.

Screenshot from 2021-04-07 14-52-11

result of xacro launch

manipulator_xacro_file_wrong

result of urdf file launch
manipulator_urdf_correct


I have also checked whether urdf files generated through rosrun xacro xacro filename > outfilename are working or not. They are giving the same error.
I have spent many hours thinking I was making some mistake.

@rohitdavas rohitdavas changed the title Xacro files and urdf files results are different Xacro files and urdf files results are different while xacro being wrong Apr 7, 2021
@rohitdavas rohitdavas changed the title Xacro files and urdf files results are different while xacro being wrong Chapter 3 Xacro files and urdf files results are different while xacro being wrong Apr 7, 2021
@rishabkr29
Copy link

Hey... Can you tell me which standard Robotic arm has been used in this project ?
can you give me the reference of Inverse Kinematics of this robot ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants