Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE REQUEST] Vertical Folder Option #834

Open
4 tasks done
swimmingrose opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks done

[FEATURE REQUEST] Vertical Folder Option #834

swimmingrose opened this issue Jan 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
0.7 0.8 enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@swimmingrose
Copy link

Preflight Checklist

  • I have read and I agree to follow the support disclaimer.
  • I am sure that my feature request has nothing to with third party extensions.
  • I am using the latest available Paperback version (currently 0.8).
  • I have searched the issue tracker for a feature request that matches the one I want to file, without success.

What type of Apple device is the feature request for?

iPhone, iPad, Mac computer

Describe the feature

Request to have folders be vertical as an option.

Could be a toggle option, like Experimental Features toggle worked in 0.7.

Feature Motivation

With vertical folders you can see more folders at once on an iPhone.

Horizontal is more optimized to an iPad, but vertical works better for an iPhone. Even on an iPad if folders are more than a few letters, cannot see your folders at the top & have to scroll significantly to access them.

Would no longer need to use short acroymn's & would be able to see & use all your folders if there was a vertical option.

Horizontal folders isn't optimized if folder names are long.

Anything Else?

No response

@swimmingrose swimmingrose added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0.7 0.8 enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant