You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I used the assemblyQC to check the quality of transcripts in several published Pear genomes. The BUSCO completeness scores look good (>95% complete completeness). In the Kraken result, all the pear transcripts were classified as apple. For example, BartDHv2 was classified 100% Malus, broken down to 41% M. domestica, 49% M. sylvestris. The remaining 10% was not labeled and the color looks like Malus. Why were the 10% transcripts not labelled to species level? And why the whole transcriptome was classified as apple, not pear (Pyrus)? Was Pyrus not included in the Kraken2 DB? Thank you.
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of the bug
I used the assemblyQC to check the quality of transcripts in several published Pear genomes. The BUSCO completeness scores look good (>95% complete completeness). In the Kraken result, all the pear transcripts were classified as apple. For example, BartDHv2 was classified 100% Malus, broken down to 41% M. domestica, 49% M. sylvestris. The remaining 10% was not labeled and the color looks like Malus. Why were the 10% transcripts not labelled to species level? And why the whole transcriptome was classified as apple, not pear (Pyrus)? Was Pyrus not included in the Kraken2 DB? Thank you.
Command used and terminal output
No response
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: