Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate Conda into the release workflow #43

Open
Twixes opened this issue Aug 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Incorporate Conda into the release workflow #43

Twixes opened this issue Aug 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@Twixes
Copy link
Collaborator

Twixes commented Aug 3, 2021

We now have a Conda package too (set up by contributor @mands), defined at https://github.com/conda-forge/posthog-feedstock. But https://github.com/PostHog/posthog-python/blob/master/.github/workflows/release.yaml doesn't take it into account, which will cause the package to not be updated for Conda.

Updating the package for Conda would be just editing https://github.com/conda-forge/posthog-feedstock/blob/master/recipe/meta.yaml:

  • bumping value on line {% set version = "1.4.2" %}
  • updating dependencies on line requirements:

The way I understand the Conda feedstock workflow, this should be done by first updating our fork of that repo https://github.com/PostHog/posthog-feedstock, making the changes there, then making a PR from our fork to upstream, and merging that. But maybe just a commit should be enough? @posthog-bot is listed as a maintainer of the @conda-forge repo after all.

@Twixes Twixes added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant