You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding new features (like #36) to BASIC.SYSTEM is anticipated to be somewhere between very hard and plainly impossible.
On the other hand BASIC.SYSTEM has a feature set that I think almost all users nearly never make use of. It's the set of file I/O commands to be used from within BASIC programs also known as text files.
I presume that removing support for OPEN, CLOSE, READ, WRITE, APPEND, FLUSH and POSITION would free up quite some space inside BASIC.SYSTEM.
The current BASIC.SYSTEM with text file support should be made available as part of ProDOS with a different name (i.e. BSCFILES.SYSTEM or BASICFIL.SYSTEM or BASICFILEIO.SYS) to be explicitly used for the (seldom) scenario of running a BASIC program that makes use of file I/O.
Thanks for considering,
Oliver
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Adding new features (like #36) to BASIC.SYSTEM is anticipated to be somewhere between very hard and plainly impossible.
On the other hand BASIC.SYSTEM has a feature set that I think almost all users nearly never make use of. It's the set of file I/O commands to be used from within BASIC programs also known as text files.
I presume that removing support for
OPEN
,CLOSE
,READ
,WRITE
,APPEND
,FLUSH
andPOSITION
would free up quite some space inside BASIC.SYSTEM.The current BASIC.SYSTEM with text file support should be made available as part of ProDOS with a different name (i.e.
BSCFILES.SYSTEM
orBASICFIL.SYSTEM
orBASICFILEIO.SYS
) to be explicitly used for the (seldom) scenario of running a BASIC program that makes use of file I/O.Thanks for considering,
Oliver
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: