-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skyline: Cleanup persistent folder before and after test runs #3266
Skyline: Cleanup persistent folder before and after test runs #3266
Conversation
brendanx67
commented
Dec 6, 2024
- Helps avoid the case where a prior failure causes an echo failure in the next run because cleanup deletes left over files in the persistent folder
- Helps avoid the case where a prior failure causes an echo failure in the next run because cleanup deletes left over files in the persistent folder
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's great to make it more robust to failures. There are probably more tests that need CleanupPersistentDir() overloads added though, right? (Do you want me to take that on?)
Yes. Feel free to add them. I am focusing on the 24 officially published
tutorials. Feeling like we need an indicator for whether a tutorial is
officially published as a lot has crept into the list that is not yet
officially published.
Though maybe that is already ending in Tutorial for officially published
and I just need to downgrade the tutorials that are not official to ending
in TutorialDraft
…On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 8:16 AM Matt Chambers ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** approved this pull request.
It's great to make it more robust to failures. There are probably more
tests that need CleanupPersistentDir() overloads added though, right?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3266 (review)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACYBWUF43OQAUX2RSWQV7GL2EHEUVAVCNFSM6AAAAABTDWKQNCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDIOBVGMYDKMJWGY>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@@ -1991,6 +1991,8 @@ private void runMode_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) | |||
{ | |||
runLoops.Checked = true; | |||
runLoopsCount.Text = 1.ToString(); | |||
Offscreen.Checked = false; // Can't do screenshots offscreen |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't appear to be re-enabled when the control is switched back to Test
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably want a behavior more like what you get when parallel mode is turned on/off
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. I think I fixed the potential inconsistencies the code was allowing before.