Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stop shuffling coupling map node indices in VF2 passes #13492

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Commits on Nov 25, 2024

  1. Stop shuffling coupling map node indices in VF2 passes

    This commit updates the preset pass manager construction usage of the
    VF2Layout and VF2PostLayout to stop shuffling the coupling map nodes by
    default. The theory behind the node shuffling is that since we limit the
    search space in the interest of runtime shuffling the node indices would
    change the search order to hopefully find a match that would be
    otherwise missed because we hit the internal state visit limit. However,
    this is showing in practice not to having a huge impact, especially
    since we're using the ordering heuristic from vf2++ that orders nodes by
    degree for the vf2 search. However, in the case of a circuit that was
    hardware efficient this can have the negative effect of making it harder
    for vf2 to find potential matches, especially on regular lattices. For
    example, in cases of a square grid lattice coupling map, and a path
    interaction graph (e.g. 0->1->2->3) the shuffling makes it much harder
    to find the mapping. This is because the lattice graphs the node degree
    is the same (or fall into the same few types of nodes) so the influence
    of the vf2++ heuristic isn't as significant and the index order has a
    larger impact because it is the search order for vf2. For smaller graphs
    this wasn't as noticeable but as devices scale up this effect has more of
    an impact.
    
    Since we rely solely on VF2 to find a perfect layout at higher
    optimization levels this shuffling is not desireable because we always
    want to find the perfect layout if it exists, especially for hardware
    efficient circuits that are constructed to not require swaps. So
    prioritizing the results for hardware efficient circuits is desireable
    by default.
    
    From an API impact perspective this doesn't change any of the interfaces
    or defaults for the VF2 passes in the interest of backwards
    compatibility. The only change is that this updates how we instantiate
    the VF2 passes to always use a deterministic node ordering independent
    of any user specified seed. This will be fully deterministic even in
    cases the user specifies a seed value for the transpilation, the output
    just might not be the same as before with the fixed seed; which is not
    guaranteed between releases.
    mtreinish committed Nov 25, 2024
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    bdaff35 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history