You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am thinking of moving the output filter file name to IOin_rhessys_input. I think this would make the usage more consistent with the other inputs (like the tec file) and would simplify the IOin_output_filter structure.
For example, if an existing output_filter was being used, then a path name in IOin_rhessys_input is all that would be need. If a new output filter is desired, then the path name in IOin_rhessys_input would be specified but an output_filter argument would be added.
Any thoughts or objections?
Ryan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
yes I think that makes sense, and would get rid of some current replication. Feel free to go ahead with that change if you have a chance, The main thing if you're going to do that is to update the example rmd (vignettes/IOin_examples.rmd) just so there's a clear example usage.
Will,
I am thinking of moving the output filter file name to IOin_rhessys_input. I think this would make the usage more consistent with the other inputs (like the tec file) and would simplify the IOin_output_filter structure.
For example, if an existing output_filter was being used, then a path name in IOin_rhessys_input is all that would be need. If a new output filter is desired, then the path name in IOin_rhessys_input would be specified but an output_filter argument would be added.
Any thoughts or objections?
Ryan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: