Replies: 1 comment
-
@bjkreitz and/or @ChrisBNEU thoughts on this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello! I'm currently doing some tutorials of RMG. I am using both RMG 3.2.0 and RMG 3.0.0 to compare the results between them. I'm curious about how you adjust the parameters of the input files or utilize some techniques to obtain almost same results between the version 3.2.0 and 3.0.0. Can I ask some help?
For instance, I'm currently working on the "methane_steam" located in examples/rmg/catalysis/methane_steam/input.py. Please see the input file attached for more detail (input_RMG300.py). When I ran the simulation, I got the below result .(result_RMG300.log).
Then, I also ran the same calculation on RMG 3.2.0 but I had to change some of the database as follows as the file names of the database have been changed.
I stopped the simulation in 20 minutes because the previous simulation was done in 8 minutes and the number of the core reactions and species were much less.
Thank you very much for working on this issue!
RMG_methane_steam_git.zip
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions