-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Downloading all not found networks #106
Comments
Hi,
If you have ideas and HW and want to try some more hashes, drop me a mail and we'll discuss. We have some hashes, we've battered for years and still standing :) |
Thanks to you for the project, to the dedication to maintenance and for the quick and kind response!
Sure, will do it in a few days. I wanted to make a "Huge wordlist with a huge list of hashes" experiment, more like a one-off than a continuous run.
I tried it, but only takes one unique SSID at a time, a run with wordlist takes 36 hours, so it would take 36h for each...., while giving hundreds, thousands (?) of hashes at a time should make it more efficient (should.. I mean that's the point of experimenting) |
@RealEnder does wpa sec only use word list ? because if the password is not in a word list this mean we will never be able to discover password but only check for ones that have already been found maybe having a mode where the Decrypter can do Mask Attack to find new password could be nice on old network that have never been found |
@S0ly now rules are implemented it will help a little bit.
|
@RealEnder Alex, here is some comparison:
1 device multiple hashes
Multiple devices, one hash
Multiple devices multiple hashes
|
Hello,
I've been running help_crack.py and I've noticed it's way inefficient in 2024:
This means that a lot of time is wasted in hashcat autotuning and loading the dictionaries, for a run that lasts only a few seconds.
I quickly scanned the server source code but I haven't found an endpoint to get all the uncracked hashes. I think doing so would speed up a lot the research, as people (like me) can try their own huge dictionaries on them.
An alternative would be to get N hashes at the same time (maybe the user (the client) can choose how many, up to a max of 10? 100?), and maybe considering merging some dicts together (like the wps keys)?.
Thank you for the amazing project <3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: