You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from Collab22 session:
a couple comments from the Barry/David group that it's a bit distracting to start this section with an aside about sync v. async code review.
(or at least, I heard the comments that way because I also found this a bit disorienting on my read through)
Consider:
re-frame "code review is a process with sync + aysnc components"
move to the end
remove completely -- because this particular section focuses on a face-to-face component of our process designed specifically for researchers; could say at end something like "future reviews between this author and reviewer may move to a combination of sync/async as both become familiar with the research question + and related code"
e.g. from @lucydot (tagging people so we can hopefully give credit later)
At the beginning of the section re-frame as “code review can be split into two types: synchronous and asynchronous….” and then the box about asynchronous review (or move this box to the end of the section?).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The aside on asynchronous review could maybe be lower down. If the thought is that meeting in person is a ‘better’ option then it should probably come first.
from Collab22 session:
a couple comments from the Barry/David group that it's a bit distracting to start this section with an aside about sync v. async code review.
(or at least, I heard the comments that way because I also found this a bit disorienting on my read through)
Consider:
e.g. from @lucydot (tagging people so we can hopefully give credit later)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: