You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
more feedback from Collab22:
in "author and reviewer meet" section of "perform code review", should have language re-iterating that author and reviewer should have conversations about and agree on what is "safe" and how they prefer to receive feedback
being prescriptive about what is risky, what is safe
re: cultural differences
some ppl might prefer more direct feedback
ofc, ppl can have different communication styles for many reasons but one is cultural differences that may go unconsidered
Both @RaoOfPhysics and Matt Alexandrakis made similar points in our discussion
(again tagging to credit later when possible, couldn't find a GH profile for Matt who is an RSE at QMUL)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
more feedback from Collab22:
in "author and reviewer meet" section of "perform code review", should have language re-iterating that author and reviewer should have conversations about and agree on what is "safe" and how they prefer to receive feedback
ofc, ppl can have different communication styles for many reasons but one is cultural differences that may go unconsidered
Both @RaoOfPhysics and Matt Alexandrakis made similar points in our discussion
(again tagging to credit later when possible, couldn't find a GH profile for Matt who is an RSE at QMUL)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: