-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sort entries by number of 3D structures #35
Comments
Hey, is anyone working on this issue? |
I was looking into the source code and managed to create a working patch to enable sorting by the # of 3D structures. I was wondering, it would be nice to have more sorting parameters like: |
Hello Ankit Kumar,
Thank you for your interest in the parameters for sorting the information in Rfam.
We appreciated very much the suggestions for Rfam and we will take this into consideration for future developments in the database.
Also if you are interested in sharing the patch that you develop, please feel free to share it with us.
Best wishes,
Nancy Ontiveros
… On 12 Apr 2021, at 10:22, Ankit Kumar (अंकित कुमार) ***@***.***> wrote:
I was looking into the source code and managed to create a working patch to enable sorting by the # of 3D structures. I was wondering, it would be nice to have more sorting parameters like: num_seed, num_species, ... when search_type='all'
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOFRESZYLYUNVUEH2WOLUBDTIK3XBANCNFSM4KPZQDDA>.
|
ankitskvmdam
pushed a commit
to ankitskvmdam/rfam-website
that referenced
this issue
Apr 12, 2021
fixes: Rfam#35
@ankitskvmdam Thanks a lot for the PR! I will take a look and get back to you. Also well done navigating the Rfam codebase! 👏 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Trying to list all the Rfam families that have
pseudoknots
and3D structures
, but at the moment it is not possible to sort by the # of 3D structures and would be very useful.Blame @kalvari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: