Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"merge-by-painting" logic considered harmful #5

Open
mikeroberts3000 opened this issue Sep 25, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

"merge-by-painting" logic considered harmful #5

mikeroberts3000 opened this issue Sep 25, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

@mikeroberts3000
Copy link

Surprisingly, feedback received from our group of Summer 2013 interns suggests that the "merge-by-painting" logic is counter-productive. The interns found this logic (i.e., the logic that selects the largest segment as the keep-this-label label, and applies that label to all the other segments) confusing.

The interns claimed they would prefer specifying the keep-this-label label more directly. The interns suggested the following method for directly specifying the keep-this-label label: the first label you click on when doing a merge-by-painting stroke would be the keep-this-label label; in other words, merge-by-painting strokes would always flow from the keep-this-label label to all other labels.

To work around this issue, the interns encouraged each other to never use the merge tool, and instead use the merging functionality that exists in the split tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant