You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am quite interested in judging segmentation quality for my data.
I work with spatial transcriptmomics, where were retrieve discrete counts for measured genes in the cells.
The technology is very highly multiplexed, I could probably pick out 50 high quality markers.
Do you think your model would be applicable to that usecase? Should I transform my input counts somehow?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Surely. Your data needs to be in a continuous distribution, so I suggest normalizing first.
The best use case for this model would be to define a subset of your high quality "lineage/important" markers to subset your expression matrix (for instance a cell by 10 marker matrix if say you have 10 lineage markers) and have the expected expression being defined in your prior matrix (this is to define them 1, 2, 3 as defined in the readme, so a expected cluster count by 10 markers). The important part would be to first define your cell types/clusters which is essential for your prior matrix.
Congratulations on the preprint.
I am quite interested in judging segmentation quality for my data.
I work with spatial transcriptmomics, where were retrieve discrete counts for measured genes in the cells.
The technology is very highly multiplexed, I could probably pick out 50 high quality markers.
Do you think your model would be applicable to that usecase? Should I transform my input counts somehow?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: