You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the documentation you suggest that the cluster assignment probability can be used as a confidence score to filter out low probability mutations. I was wondering if you can recommend a threshold to use for filtering?
Edit: I actually came up with a second, unrelated question. In #14 you mentioned that when using multiple, related samples one has to provide read counts for positions that were not called as a variant in other samples. I have done some research and not found an efficient way to get these counts for reference and alternative allele. I was planning to approximate by getting the total number of reads at those positions which is done easily and then using ref_counts = total number of reads and alt_counts = 0, which assumes that if the mutation has not been called, it does not exist. Can I work with this assumption without affecting the results too strongly?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
In the documentation you suggest that the cluster assignment probability can be used as a confidence score to filter out low probability mutations. I was wondering if you can recommend a threshold to use for filtering?
Edit: I actually came up with a second, unrelated question. In #14 you mentioned that when using multiple, related samples one has to provide read counts for positions that were not called as a variant in other samples. I have done some research and not found an efficient way to get these counts for reference and alternative allele. I was planning to approximate by getting the total number of reads at those positions which is done easily and then using ref_counts = total number of reads and alt_counts = 0, which assumes that if the mutation has not been called, it does not exist. Can I work with this assumption without affecting the results too strongly?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: