Skip to content
kshepher edited this page Aug 23, 2012 · 11 revisions

This page is for discussion of use cases, requirements, etc. for expressing relations

Notes from August 21 discussion

Discussion:

  • Are existing elements acceptable on their own for expressing some kind of machine-readable relationship?
  • If not, what are the use cases for expressing machine-readable relationships?
  • To what extent is EAD capable of providing machine-readable relationships currently, or need enhancements to do that, or is EAD designed for that purpose anyway?
  • Should the activity of expressing machine-readable relationships be done within EAD? Or should it be a separate activity?
  • Do we start to identifying core relationships (ones that are more important to start with)?
  • Need to come out and say we’re not taking away the ability for people to write narrative finding aids

Use cases (do they lead to need for machine-readable)?

  • Use cases are already baked into the motivation of description
  • Finding aid and repository –it’s not an explicitly stated relationship in EAD – you can assume it; requires computer to make parsing decisions; not explicit in structure of EAD; can probably parse out the information and generate the relationship (as SNAC does), or can state it more explicitly; to parse it out, it requires very consistent data, and there may be too many assumptions to make
  • I want to be able to have a mechanism by which I can consistently refer to all of the finding aids related to a single repository.
  • You have an EAC record that you want to connect to a collection, and see all of the other records the creator is mentioned in
  • Connecting finding aids together through related material
  • Controlled access – relationship between a collection and topic in the collection

Problems/Limitations:

  • No method to express type of relationship – EAD is limited in its expressiveness
  • Even examples (such as ) in Tag Library show different kinds of data in the bibref

Outline:

  • Here are relationships we want to express: Repository to materials/finding aid Creator(s) to materials/finding aid Finding aid to finding aid Subjects (topics, genres, names) to materials/finding aid

  • Here’s what we need to do that requires those relationships to be expressed in a machine-readable way.

  • Here’s how it can or can’t be done in EAD.

  • Here’s how it could be done in EAD, without impinging on people’s ability to create narrative finding aids.

Clone this wiki locally