Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ADA Compliance #567

Open
dwhitig opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

ADA Compliance #567

dwhitig opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dwhitig
Copy link
Contributor

dwhitig commented Jul 9, 2024

Need to consider if SEA is ADA compliant.

  1. Back in
  2. Front end

Is there a way to do an automated test of this?

PSU information
https://accessibility.psu.edu/accommodations/policy/
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

@dwhitig dwhitig added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 9, 2024
@KathyZimmerman
Copy link

KathyZimmerman commented Dec 6, 2024

Are Web office just flagged the calendar for ADA compliance as well. And, they actually sent me to this issue ..

Question for @rdblake21 am I also understanding after today's Ask Me Anything -- that Mason can use the code Thad provides here - and, create our own compliant page?

@rdblake21
Copy link
Contributor

@KathyZimmerman I think @tcdahlberg captures some of what you're asking in a recent response in the community. The link you have it more centered on embedding the existing calendar onto an external website. Depending on what's not meeting ADA Compliance, you may need to just create your own calendar leveraging the feed, which I'm realizing isn't documented welll...

Here's some of it captured in the release notes.. across two releases

We likely need to update the instructions (please correct me @tcdahlberg).

@KathyZimmerman
Copy link

KathyZimmerman commented Dec 10, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants