Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

STP v2.3.4 submission #74

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024
Merged

STP v2.3.4 submission #74

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

TrevorHansen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 30, 2024

Summary of modified submissions

STP

  • 6 authors
  • website: https://stp.github.io/
  • Participations
    • SingleQuery
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all
    • ModelValidation
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all
    • Incremental
      • QF_Bitvec
        • all

@bobot bobot added the submission Submissions for SMT-COMP label May 31, 2024
@bobot
Copy link
Contributor

bobot commented May 31, 2024

martinjonas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2024
#84: Create cvc5-cloud
#74: Draft STP submission
#70: draft yicesQS submission
#68: Create STP-CNFLS
#66: Yices2 SMTCOMP 2024 Submission
#65: Z3-alpha draft PR
#64: Solver submission: cvc5
#63: submission iProver
#61: OSTRICH 1.4
#60: SMT-RAT submission
#57: Amaya's submission for SMT-COMP 2024
#55: plat-smt submission
#54: Add 2024 Bitwuzla submission.
#53: 2024 solver participant submission: OpenSMT
#52: Z3-Noodler submission
#51: Submission Colibri
#45: Submission for smtinterpol
#42: Adding Algaroba to SMTCOMP 2024
@TrevorHansen TrevorHansen changed the title Draft STP submission STP v2.3.4 submission Jun 13, 2024
@TrevorHansen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@martinjonas
Copy link
Contributor

@TrevorHansen Thanks for the update! We have managed to run test runs of STP for single query, incremental, and model-validation tracks on a small subset of benchmarks. You can find the results here:

Quick explanation for the single-query track:

  • Green status means that the result agrees with the (set-info :status _) annotation from the benchmark.
  • Blue status means that the benchmark has annotation (set-info :status unknown).
  • By clicking on the result (e.g. false, true, ABORTED, …) you can see the command-line arguments with which your solver was executed and its output on the benchmark.
  • By clicking on the benchmark name (i.e., *scrambled*.yml), you can see the details of the benchmark including its contents (by clicking on the file link in input_files) and the name of the original bennchmark before scrambling (e.g., # original_files: 'non-incremental/AUFBVFP/20210301-Alive2-partial-undef/ph7/583_ph7.smt2').

For the incremental track, the status column has the following meaning:

  • DONE (X correct): the solver terminated successfully and correctly decided X (check-sat) queries before that.
  • SOMETHING_ELSE (X correct) (e.g., TIMEOUT (10 correct) or ABORTED (10 correct)): The solver did not terminate successfully, but correctly decided X (check-sat) queries before it crashed or was killed.
  • WRONG: There was at least one answer to (check-sat) that did not agree with the status specified in the benchmark.

Please let me know if you find any discrepancies or any logics to which you subscribed and seem to be missing (or the other way round).

@martinjonas martinjonas merged commit 94d413e into SMT-COMP:master Jun 18, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
submission Submissions for SMT-COMP
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants