Naming Azure resources rule feedback

[bradystroud]

Cc: @adamcogan @pierssinclairssw @matt-goldman @wicksipedia @brydeno

Hi @lukecookssw,

https://www.ssw.com.au/rules/azure-naming-resources

This naming convention wont work in some scenarios. There is a plan for the exceptions section but it doesn't actually explain how to plan for exceptions.

The rule should suggest how to handle exceptions, or not suggest a naming convention at all.
Not suggesting a naming convention would make this rule easier to maintain.

1. If you agree, update the rule to not suggest a naming convention

[wicksipedia]

Hey @bradystroud
Some of us had a discussion last night about aligning more with https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/azure-best-practices/resource-naming which should make things easier to maintain.

Hey @lukecookssw maybe the exception for storage accounts should be called out since it is a common one

[tiagov8]

Hey @bradystroud

Could this issue be closed?

[bradystroud]

Hey @tiagov8

No - still an issue
I would prefer this rule to reccomend following Microsoft's reccomendations rather than our own format that we will need to maintain as per @wicksipedia 's suggestion

This probably wont be actioned but I'll keep the issue here as a 'for the record'