-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refine binding energy of 10% of total particles #62
Conversation
I can run tests using 1% and 10% of the particles, and see if that makes a difference. Submitting now... |
Note that once we implement halo unbinding in multiple MPI ranks, this step will use more memory than the actual iterative unbinding itself. |
…centre To recover a constant value of subsampling, one can use a value of 0.
Based on my tests, 1% of particles can be insufficient when trying to improve the centering. I suggest we go with a default of 10%. Do we want to keep the new parameter I added as an option for a user to use? |
I think it's good to have it as a parameter, makes it more likely that people will be aware that the refinement step exists. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks good to me. @robjmcgibbon any further comments before merging, especially concerning my changes?
See discussion at https://leiden-observatory.slack.com/archives/C0697E1L4MA/p1728981990119389
The 10% value is arbitrary, so I'm opening to changing it