Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MethodError: no method matching OrdinaryDiffEq.InterpolationData #274

Closed
baggepinnen opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels

Comments

@baggepinnen
Copy link

Describe the bug 🐞

Error MethodError: no method matching OrdinaryDiffEq.InterpolationData encountered during test of ControlSystems.jl:
https://github.com/JuliaControl/ControlSystems.jl/actions/runs/7180061166/job/19551540208?pr=907#step:6:707

Minimal Reproducible Example 👇

The test that threw the error

Error & Stacktrace ⚠️

Liked above

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • Output of using Pkg; Pkg.status()
     Testing ControlSystems
      Status `/tmp/jl_ldIDeQ/Project.toml`
⌅ [4c88cf16] Aqua v0.5.6
  [a6e380b2] ControlSystems v1.10.0 `~/work/ControlSystems.jl/ControlSystems.jl`
  [aaaaaaaa] ControlSystemsBase v1.10.1
  [bcd4f6db] DelayDiffEq v5.43.2
  [459566f4] DiffEqCallbacks v2.34.0
  [e30172f5] Documenter v1.2.1
  [f6369f11] ForwardDiff v0.10.36
  [28b8d3ca] GR v0.72.10
  [e91730f6] Hungarian v0.7.0
  [1dea7af3] OrdinaryDiffEq v6.61.0
  [91a5bcdd] Plots v1.39.0
  [3cdcf5f2] RecipesBase v1.3.4
  [189a3867] Reexport v1.2.2
  [90137ffa] StaticArrays v1.7.0
  [37e2e46d] LinearAlgebra
  [44cfe95a] Pkg v1.9.2
  [de0858da] Printf
  [9a3f8284] Random
  [2f01184e] SparseArrays
  [8dfed614] Test
  • Output of using Pkg; Pkg.status(; mode = PKGMODE_MANIFEST)

See GH actions log

v1.9 GH actions

Additional context

The test or the functionality it tests hasn't been changed in a long time, so some update to DelayDiffEq/DiffEqBase etc. appears to have changed

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#2048 broke it (as predicted by @ChrisRackauckas, so the issue is known).

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Yeah I know...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants