You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I understand the purpose of LinearSolve, it is an attemp at providing downstream users and developpers a unified interface between multiple solvers.
As highlighted by the documentation, matrix factorizations play a significant role in the different solvers. However, it does not seem that a unified interface for these factorizations is provided by LinearSolve.
I'm just thinking about this because I'm myself in the need of finding the best QR factorization (to retrieve the R term only) for one of my projects and LinearSolve seemed a nice place to start from. I thought I would find something like
Would such an approach be relevant for LinearSolve or is it useless ? I can't really make my mind... it seems completely overkill, yet achieves somewhat the same pupose as LinearProblem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Question❓
As far as I understand the purpose of
LinearSolve
, it is an attemp at providing downstream users and developpers a unified interface between multiple solvers.As highlighted by the documentation, matrix factorizations play a significant role in the different solvers. However, it does not seem that a unified interface for these factorizations is provided by
LinearSolve
.I'm just thinking about this because I'm myself in the need of finding the best QR factorization (to retrieve the R term only) for one of my projects and
LinearSolve
seemed a nice place to start from. I thought I would find something likeWould such an approach be relevant for
LinearSolve
or is it useless ? I can't really make my mind... it seems completely overkill, yet achieves somewhat the same pupose asLinearProblem
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: