Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BatchIntegralFunction revisions #535

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023
Merged

Conversation

lxvm
Copy link
Contributor

@lxvm lxvm commented Oct 30, 2023

This pr is needed by Integrals.jl so that the new interface introduced in SciMLBasev2 can correctly reproduce the old behavior. Mainly, the documentation now says that the integrand prototypes are arrays of the same kind as what the integrand will consume, and integral algorithms are responsible for providing those same arrays.

The only additional thing I added were getproperty methods for the bounds of the integration domain. Although these will no longer be used by the updated Integrals.jl, it could help avoid bugs for users migrating to the new version.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #535 (10307a5) into master (6b0a385) will decrease coverage by 1.06%.
The diff coverage is 35.29%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #535      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.04%   54.98%   -1.06%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        3981     3988       +7     
==========================================
- Hits         2231     2193      -38     
- Misses       1750     1795      +45     
Files Coverage Δ
src/scimlfunctions.jl 61.02% <ø> (-1.33%) ⬇️
src/problems/basic_problems.jl 66.66% <35.29%> (-12.09%) ⬇️

... and 11 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit dee9a98 into SciML:master Nov 1, 2023
54 of 70 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants