Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[🐛 Bug]: Code verifying video integrity does not work #2743

Closed
MJB222398 opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 6 comments
Closed

[🐛 Bug]: Code verifying video integrity does not work #2743

MJB222398 opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 6 comments

Comments

@MJB222398
Copy link

MJB222398 commented Mar 31, 2025

What happened?

I have a Docker Selenium Grid with a Hub, several nodes, and then a separate video container for each node. These video containers have SE_VIDEO_FILE_NAME=auto so the videos recorded have the filename of SessionId.mp4. My understanding is that function wait_for_file_integrity in video.sh should be called automatically when the driver session is ended. So what I am doing is disposing of the web driver (.NET bindings) at the end of each test and then making HTTP calls to the grid status endpoint to verify that the session has indeed finished. I then am grabbing the video file. What I am seeing though is that this video file is malformed and will not play because the file was not terminated yet - it was still being written/flushed to disk at the point I retrieved it.

Looking in the logs there is nothing there indicating that the wait_for_file_integrity function ran at all - though if the file is present and correct on first check there would be no logs. So either the function is not being called, or the function is not working properly and states the video is fine when it isn't, or perhaps the function is running later on in the background or something else? Is this function call blocking session termination untill the video integrity is good? Just not clear at all on how its supposed to work?

This Slack conversation includes some discussion on this issue:
https://seleniumhq.slack.com/archives/C0ABCS03F/p1743072688635059

Command used to start Selenium Grid with Docker (or Kubernetes)

N/A

Relevant log output

N/A

Operating System

Ubuntu

Docker Selenium version (image tag)

4.30.0-20250323 and ffmpeg-7.1.1.1.1-20250323

Selenium Grid chart version (chart version)

No response

Copy link

@MJB222398, thank you for creating this issue. We will troubleshoot it as soon as we can.


Info for maintainers

Triage this issue by using labels.

If information is missing, add a helpful comment and then I-issue-template label.

If the issue is a question, add the I-question label.

If the issue is valid but there is no time to troubleshoot it, consider adding the help wanted label.

If the issue requires changes or fixes from an external project (e.g., ChromeDriver, GeckoDriver, MSEdgeDriver, W3C), add the applicable G-* label, and it will provide the correct link and auto-close the issue.

After troubleshooting the issue, please add the R-awaiting answer label.

Thank you!

@VietND96
Copy link
Member

VietND96 commented Apr 7, 2025

It will be fixed in #2742

@VietND96 VietND96 closed this as completed Apr 7, 2025
@MJB222398
Copy link
Author

MJB222398 commented Apr 8, 2025

@VietND96 I just tried using 4.31.0-20250404 and ffmpeg-7.1-20250404 and its not fixed, the behaviour is the same. Can we re-open this please? Could you outline what you have done that was expected to fix this? Could you answer the question above about how it is supposed to work?

@VietND96
Copy link
Member

VietND96 commented Apr 8, 2025

Actually, that function get removed.
How about the percentage rate of interrupted files that you could observe?

@MJB222398
Copy link
Author

Its basically all of them - virtually 100% are interrupted and are therefore invalid video files

@MJB222398
Copy link
Author

I have added in my own check for video file integrity before I pull the file. Perhaps this is preferable to Selenium doing it itself. I was just concerned because it seemed like Selenium was intending to do this check itself but it wasn't working

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants