Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dominance checking for expansion candidates #12

Open
dharabor opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Dominance checking for expansion candidates #12

dharabor opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@dharabor
Copy link
Member

dharabor commented Nov 6, 2024

Nodes that are popped from the queue might be dominated by other nodes from the OPEN list. We need a procedure to check for dominance and avoid expanding any nodes which are dominated. We can interpret the dominance checking procedure as the application of a constraint that performs a feasibility cut.

Proposal:

  1. Unidirectional search receives a new template parameter called CONSTRAINTS.
  2. Objects which are instantiated as constraints must implement a prune function.
  3. By default, we have NO_CONSTRAINTS instantiation.
@dharabor dharabor added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants