We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As circuits become more complex is important to check that your design intent matches the produced layout
What are your plans for LVS?
We just added schematic driven layout in gdsfactory and netlist extraction and we were wondering the best way to compare both. See issue
i was wondering if this is something that you also plan on implementing in SiEPIC tools
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @joamatab ,
Without a schematic tool in KLayout, the only thing we can do is extract the netlist and run simulations.
That said, from a netlist you can create a schematic in Lumerical INTERCONNECT.
In principle, one could create a schematic in INTERCONNECT first, then compare it to the netlist extracted from the layout.
We had some efforts on creating a schematic driven layout from INTERCONNECT, but it is not complete.
Sorry, something went wrong.
SDL from interconnect sounds good
We also have a pure python SDL flow
https://gdsfactory.github.io/gdsfactory/sdl.html
No branches or pull requests
As circuits become more complex is important to check that your design intent matches the produced layout
What are your plans for LVS?
We just added schematic driven layout in gdsfactory and netlist extraction and we were wondering the best way to compare both. See issue
i was wondering if this is something that you also plan on implementing in SiEPIC tools
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: