Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add server broadcast event #5617
base: dev/feature
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add server broadcast event #5617
Changes from 15 commits
804b7ab
0506270
5d1258d
85167f5
10b7621
9140798
99c4a10
087ad0d
560f226
b2edd26
bb5b5cf
9715640
fe4c87c
a6e8e61
c036074
5664351
283b2d5
81141eb
11fc732
5515432
6fb4b2b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could use instanceof patterns since we now support Java 17
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know that this is the current behavior, but why does
REMOVE_ALL
asRESET
andDELETE
?remove all {_x} from the chat recipients
shouldn't just remove all the recipients. I don't believe it should be supported here at all anyway, as there can only be one of a recipient, not more.Also shouldn't resetting the recipients add all players back in, rather than clearing them? Because that's what I interpret from the
RESET
change mode - to reset the value to how it originally is; in this case all the playersThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, why did you mark this as resolved?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could use instanceof pattern