Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Metadata episode - review after the hackathon utrecht August 1-3 #51

Open
3 of 6 tasks
orchid00 opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Open
3 of 6 tasks

Metadata episode - review after the hackathon utrecht August 1-3 #51

orchid00 opened this issue Aug 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@orchid00
Copy link
Contributor

orchid00 commented Aug 24, 2018

Leyla, Carlos, Fatma, Radka,
@ljgarcia @c-martinez

I just merged the PRs on the metadata episode.
#45
#38
#36
#32
#31
#30

Thanks for your contributions on the metadata episode, and your effort for addressing many comments. You can now continue to work on it.

How to continue?

  • I recommend going through the issues https://github.com/SoftDev4Research/4OSS-lesson/issues and close those that have been already addressed.
  • When merging I noticed there is an exercise that has the same title, one of those might need to be removed or updated: "Exercise: Using a registry, e.g., bio.tools" It might have been my mistake, but there were about 25+ conflicts :S
  • One of the PR was changing participants for learners, I didn't know which one to pick. I particularly like participants better.
  • I would make a suggestion to look for a definition outside of wikipedia.
  • Take a look at extra resources: https://www.ands.org.au/guides/metadata-working
  • Continue the conversation on twitter, to find more examples!

This Issue can be closed or saved as record to add comments.

@orchid00 orchid00 self-assigned this Aug 24, 2018
@fpsom
Copy link
Contributor

fpsom commented Aug 29, 2018

Thanks @orchid00 ! That was awesome work - thank you very much for doing this. I will be going through the issues over the next few days and addressing them (either close or highlight as actionable).

I propose we keep this issue open for the follow-up actions as a reference point for the metadata episode.

@orchid00
Copy link
Contributor Author

sounds good!

@fpsom
Copy link
Contributor

fpsom commented Sep 3, 2018

Just added PR #52 that addresses some of the points.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants