You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My preference would be to keep the article as short as possible using the current content. I think the current form of the principles can easily be adapted to the structure of a publication. We already proposed to have the “Fears of open sourcing & some ways to handle them” section as an annex so for this publication they would fit well as supplementary materials.
To start this process we created a new google doc with the structure of a manuscript. I have created a second document to be attached as supplementary material including the fears.
I do not mind where we publish it, but I am bias to F1000. They follow the same principles we are promoting. 1.- Publication open from day one, 2.- promoted by registries like PubMed once the reviewers give their OK and 3.- article published with a license (CC-BY). I care more about these principles than the impact factor, so to me F1000 would be a great choice. Still we are open to suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To spread as wide as possible the principles we though to publish them in a journal. There are few examples we can follow. e.g.
My preference would be to keep the article as short as possible using the current content. I think the current form of the principles can easily be adapted to the structure of a publication. We already proposed to have the “Fears of open sourcing & some ways to handle them” section as an annex so for this publication they would fit well as supplementary materials.
To start this process we created a new google doc with the structure of a manuscript. I have created a second document to be attached as supplementary material including the fears.
I do not mind where we publish it, but I am bias to F1000. They follow the same principles we are promoting. 1.- Publication open from day one, 2.- promoted by registries like PubMed once the reviewers give their OK and 3.- article published with a license (CC-BY). I care more about these principles than the impact factor, so to me F1000 would be a great choice. Still we are open to suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: