You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
gis=> select osm_id,name,landuse from planet_osm_polygon where place = 'suburb';
182933675 | Seadale Gardens | (no name)
There is no corresponding point for this place way. However, many polygon places do have corresponding points:
gis=> select osm_id,name,landuse from planet_osm_polygon where place = 'suburb';
68692986 | Nunthorpe |
gis=> select osm_id,name,landuse from planet_osm_point where name = 'Nunthorpe';
osm_id | name | landuse
------------+-----------+---------
27648220 | Nunthorpe |
"suburb" is just an example here; the same problem occurs (locally to Yorkshire) with everything from "town" downwards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It'd be straightforward to add a rendering for polygons in parallel with points ("piers" and "piers_area" is a simple bit of styling that does that for linear and area piers).
What would be much harder would be "only displaying a name for a polygon if there is no name displayed as a point for the same thing".
Note that it makes sense in some cases for places to have nodes as well as place polygons. The geographic centre of Sheffield is in a rural area, but the logical centre is near the town hall. Many seaside towns have a geographic centre in the sea.
Example:
There is no corresponding point for this place way. However, many polygon places do have corresponding points:
"suburb" is just an example here; the same problem occurs (locally to Yorkshire) with everything from "town" downwards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: