Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] KaaS standards #615

Open
9 of 29 tasks
martinmo opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
9 of 29 tasks

[EPIC] KaaS standards #615

martinmo opened this issue Jun 10, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Container Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 2: Container Infra and Tooling epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints SCS is standardized SCS is standardized

Comments

@martinmo
Copy link
Member

martinmo commented Jun 10, 2024

SCS Compatible KaaS v1

Standardization

Conformance test implementation

SCS Compatible KaaS v2

Standardization

TBD

Conformance test implementation

TBD

Possible future standards and ADRs

Other issues

Links

@martinmo martinmo added Container Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 2: Container Infra and Tooling epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints SCS is standardized SCS is standardized labels Jun 10, 2024
@martinmo martinmo self-assigned this Jun 10, 2024
@martinmo
Copy link
Member Author

Because I couldn't find an epic issue with a good overview for the standardizatio in the KaaS layer, I created one. Basically, it came up in last week's Team Container call that an overview is missing. Furthermore, I've been going through all issues in the standards and issues repositories and added the Container label where it was (clearly) missing.

It would be nice if we can somehow agree on and add an ETA for the finalization of the v2 KaaS scope.

@mbuechse
Copy link
Contributor

We do have this one already: SovereignCloudStack/issues#181
But yours is more like a roadmap, so not too bad either!

@martinmo
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the hint! I linked the other epic and added some missing tasks to the list here. I agree that having this roadmap style issue has value, after all I felt the need to create it, but I didn't intend to duplicate stuff :( Maybe we can focus on this issue here and close the other one – IMHO the standards repo is the right place anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Container Issues or pull requests relevant for Team 2: Container Infra and Tooling epic Issues that are spread across multiple sprints SCS is standardized SCS is standardized
Projects
Status: Doing
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants