Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add GBAL parser for GBAHawk #2055

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Fortranm
Copy link
Contributor

@Fortranm Fortranm commented Dec 6, 2024

@@ -14,4 +14,14 @@ public async Task GBAHawk_NewHeaderValues()
Assert.AreEqual(true, result.Success);
AssertNoWarningsOrErrors(result);
}

[TestMethod]
[DataRow("System-Gbal.gbmv", SystemCodes.Gba)]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't we already have a test method that you can simply add this DataRow to?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

https://github.com/TASVideos/tasvideos/blob/main/tests/TASVideos.MovieParsers.Tests/Bk2ParserTests.cs#L131
That's in Bk2ParserTests.cs. I thought it would make more sense to put this test in the one for GBAHawk parser.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, mb

@@ -14,4 +14,14 @@ public async Task GBAHawk_NewHeaderValues()
Assert.AreEqual(true, result.Success);
AssertNoWarningsOrErrors(result);
}

[TestMethod]
[DataRow("System-Gbal.gbmv", SystemCodes.Gba)]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, mb

@adelikat adelikat merged commit bb5c0b6 into TASVideos:main Dec 6, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants