Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QC field maps? #3

Open
pipitone opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

QC field maps? #3

pipitone opened this issue Apr 8, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@pipitone
Copy link
Member

pipitone commented Apr 8, 2015

Right now we don't have a way of including field maps in our QC pipeline. Is there something we could/should be doing with these field maps that would provide an indication of scan quality/integrity?

@josephdviviano
Copy link
Contributor

We could make a visual print out of them, but I've never heard of this before.

@djrotenberg
Copy link

Phase maps are a bit tricky, not only because of phase-wrapping but due to the arbitrary phase values from the scanner (If not calculated directly from the raw complex data).

One method that I have seen before is to look at the phase derivative. Here's one example of that: http://www.tnw.tudelft.nl/fileadmin/Faculteit/TNW/Over_de_faculteit/Afdelingen/Imaging_Science_and_Technology/Research/Research_Groups/Quantitative_Imaging/Publications/List_Publications/doc/Supri_asci01.pdf

Generally, regardless of the absolute value, the rate of change should be more smoothly varying under less noisy conditions.

@josephdviviano
Copy link
Contributor

Do we need to consider the derivative in all directions or just the phase-encoding direction?

@pipitone pipitone modified the milestone: sometime Mar 10, 2016
@josephdviviano josephdviviano self-assigned this Sep 20, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants