You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As claiming in the paper, the proposed methods tracks the object in occlusion and uses a new datasets for videos training and propagation.
So I have two questions about this:
Do this methods lead to higher FP ? Because the paper have not shown this metric.
I notices that crowded human datasets is used in model training. So, compared the proposed synthetic data, which data can bring much gains?
Thank you for your outstanding works. I am interesting in this paper and want to know more about the details. I am looking forward to getting your responds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We avoid false positives by additionally training a box visibility classifier, and only outputting visible detections at test time.
CrowdHuman dataset increases visible person detection accuracy, but training on synthetic data allows us to learn to localize people behind occlusions. These two factors are complementary, and both necessary for achieving top results.
As claiming in the paper, the proposed methods tracks the object in occlusion and uses a new datasets for videos training and propagation.
So I have two questions about this:
Thank you for your outstanding works. I am interesting in this paper and want to know more about the details. I am looking forward to getting your responds.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: