Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some questions about paper #4

Open
JoJoliking opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Some questions about paper #4

JoJoliking opened this issue Oct 8, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@JoJoliking
Copy link

As claiming in the paper, the proposed methods tracks the object in occlusion and uses a new datasets for videos training and propagation.
So I have two questions about this:

  1. Do this methods lead to higher FP ? Because the paper have not shown this metric.
  2. I notices that crowded human datasets is used in model training. So, compared the proposed synthetic data, which data can bring much gains?
    Thank you for your outstanding works. I am interesting in this paper and want to know more about the details. I am looking forward to getting your responds.
@pvtokmakov
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi,

thanks for you interest in our work!

  1. We avoid false positives by additionally training a box visibility classifier, and only outputting visible detections at test time.
  2. CrowdHuman dataset increases visible person detection accuracy, but training on synthetic data allows us to learn to localize people behind occlusions. These two factors are complementary, and both necessary for achieving top results.

This was referenced Dec 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants