Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tendrl Documentation Recommendations #103

Open
julienlim opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Tendrl Documentation Recommendations #103

julienlim opened this issue Apr 3, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@julienlim
Copy link
Member

The Tendrl repo should have easily accessible user-facing documents that are easily maintainable / editable via GitHub to enable community contributions (e.g. MkDocs-like which is also what Gluster uses for their docs), and accessible from the Tendrl GitHub repo and Tendrl website.

Consider a repo for tendrl-docs to include the following:

  • Getting Started & Install Guide which should include Performance and Sizing Guidelines
  • Release Notes
  • Administration / User Guide
  • Troubleshooting Guide
  • Developer’s / Contributor’s Guide
  • Upgrade Guide
  • Glossary

@Tendrl/specs @Tendrl/qe @Tendrl/frontend @Tendrl/docs

@mbukatov
Copy link

mbukatov commented Apr 3, 2018

See also: Tendrl/specifications#25

@mbukatov
Copy link

mbukatov commented Apr 3, 2018

I would suggest to either switch to rst sphinx (read the docs) project or asciidoc asciidoctor project.

The 1st one could be easily setup on readthedocs site, for the latter, we would need to make a CentOS CI building job.

I would vote against whatever gluster.org project is using right now, as I consider it quite terrible (markdown hacked into read the docs like project template).

Back in January this year, I discussed this with Rohan and we concluded that the 1st step could be to move the documentation completely to the wiki and then use either sphinx or asciidoctor project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants