Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review the API and correct any obvious mistakes #2

Open
edwardhamilton opened this issue Dec 23, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

Review the API and correct any obvious mistakes #2

edwardhamilton opened this issue Dec 23, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@edwardhamilton
Copy link
Member

Hi Daniel,

Please review the Gateway API and correct anything that obviously wrong. I kind of based it on the T Dispatch API. However I want to make sure we differentiate it from that API enough.

I haven't yet fixed all the examples. As you have time, you can fixup the examples when you see they're obviously wrong or incomplete. I'll be doing the same.

Also, I welcome your comments.

Ed

@DanielMontesDeOca
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Edward,
Ok I'll check it out now, I was getting the web apps up. Since we don't have a domain pointed to our server yet what I did for now was leave the API on port 80 and the web apps on port 8080.
Service Stack API: http://54.201.134.194/San francisco: http://54.201.134.194:8080/sanfrancisco/index.phpNew york: http://54.201.134.194:8080/newyork/index.php
Still haven't added the proper API keys to them, I'll do that next.
Regards,
Daniel
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:18:55 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Subject: [GatewayAPI] Review the API and correct any obvious mistakes (#2)

Hi Daniel,

Please review the Gateway API and correct anything that obviously wrong. I kind of based it on the T Dispatch API. However I want to make sure we differentiate it from that API enough.

I haven't yet fixed all the examples. As you have time, you can fixup the examples when you see they're obviously wrong or incomplete. I'll be doing the same.

Also, I welcome your comments.

Ed


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants